Technology Intervention in Teaching English for the Integrated Teacher Education Programme—A Minor Study

Authors

  • Dr. Chandrasekharan Praveen Author

Keywords:

Communication, Integrated Four Year Courses, NEP 2020, Speaking Skil, Technology Tools

Abstract

As per the guidelines of the National Education Policy (NEP)2020, efforts are underway to launch four year Un- der Graduate (UG) programmes replacing the three year UG programme. And recently as per the guidelines of NEP, the four year Integrated Teacher Education Programme (ITEP) is being launched in several institutions. It is common practice in many universities across the country to offer English as a compulsory subject of study dur- ing the first two semesters. Though not completely matching with existing patterns in university departments, the National Council for Teacher Education in the ‘Suggested Curriculum for ITEP’ for the newly launched BScBEd programme, proposed the teaching of the English language during the first semester of the eight semester course.
The investigator was assigned to teach English in the first batch of the ITEP. The newly joined students had cleared a national level test, and were found to be fairly competent in the use of English. So the investigator draw- ing on a decade long experience of Techno-pedagogy, adapted digital tools to create challenging tasks to ensure student attention and participation while transacting the content.
The paper commences with the background of the study, identifies the need for technology intervention and reports on the strategy employed for integrating social media like WhatsApp and email, and the use of digital tools like videos, visuals, infographics and animated gifs for transacting the content of the paper, ‘English for Com- munication’. It is hoped that the study would sensitize participants to the scope and possibilities of technological intervention in the newly launched teacher education programme.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Alber, Rebecca. Using Video Content to Amplify Learning. Edutopia. March 18. 2019. https://www.edutopia.org/ article/using-video-content-amplify-learning/

Ansari & Khan.(2020).Smart Learning Environments. 7:9.Springer Open. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40561-020-

00118-7

Brame, Cynthia, J.(2016). Effective Educational Videos: Principles and Guidelines for Maximizing Student Learning from Video Content. CBE—Life Sciences Education.15:es6, Winter pp1-6.

Brown, H. D. (2001). Teaching by Principle: An Interactive Approach to Language Pedagogy. New York: Longman. Çakir, D. I. (2006). The use of video as an audio-visual material in foreign language teaching classroom. The Turkish

Online Journal of Educational Technology, 5(4), pp67-72.

deKoning B, Tabbers H, Rikers R, Paas F. (2009). Towards a framework for attention cueing in instructional anima- tions: guidelines for research and design. Educ Psychol Rev 21, pp113–140.

Ellis, Rod. 2009. “Investigating Learning Difficulty in Terms of Implicit and Explicit Knowledge” dalam David Singleton Implicit and Explicit Knowledge in Second Language Learning, Testing and Teaching. Great Brit- ain: Short Run Press Ltd.

Goodspeed, Jon. Support students’ learning, and find the best video streaming sites for schools and classrooms. Com- mon Sense Education. November 10,2022. https://www.commonsense.org/education/articles/teachers-essen- tial-guide-to-showing-movies-and-videos-in-the-classroom

Greenhow, C. (2011a). Online social networks and learning. On the horizon, 19(1), pp4-12.

Hashemi, Ali & Daneshfar, Samran. (2018). The Impact of Different Teaching Strategies on Teaching Grammar to College Students. Theory and Practice in Language Studies. 8. 340. 10.17507/tpls.0803.10.

Herron, et. al, (1995). Practical Aspects of Using Video in the Foreign Language Classroom. TESL Journal, Vol. VI, No. 11, November 2000.

Ibrahim M, Antonenko PD, Greenwood CM, Wheeler D. (2012). Effects of segmenting, signaling, and weeding on learning from educational video. Learn Media Technol 37, pp220–235.

Kaltura report. The state of video in education 2017. https://www.slideshare.net/eraser/the-state-of-video-in-educa- tion-2017-a-kaltura-report

Kumar, Indu.Technology in Education: NDEAR. Available at : https://www.education.gov.in/shikshakparv/docs/Tech- nology_Education_Background_note.pdf

Light, Daniel. Technology, teaching and learning. https://sowc2015.unicef.org/stories/a-technology-ecosystem-to- support-learning/

National Education Policy. (2020). Ministry of Human Resource Development.Government of India. https://www.

education.gov.in/sites/upload_files/mhrd/files/NEP_Final_English_0.pdf

Nurdin, N., Pettalongi, S. S., & Mangasing, M. (2019). Understanding Digital Skill Use from

The Technology Continuance Theory (TCT). 2019 6th International Conference on Information Technology, Com- puter and Electrical Engineering (ICITACEE).

Perez, Eva & Manca, Stefania & Fernández-Pascual, R. & Mc Guckin, Conor. (2023). A systematic review of social media as a teaching and learning tool in higher education: A theoretical grounding perspective. Education and Information Technologies. 28. 1-30. 10.1007/s10639-023-11647-2.

Reimagining the role of Technology in Education. (2017).National Education Technology Plan Update.Office of Educational Technology.

Senchina DS. (2011). Video laboratories for the teaching and learning of professional ethics in exercise physiology curricula. Adv Physiol Educ 35, pp264–269.

Target Video. Video teaching: How to use video in the classroom.July 30,2020. https://target-video.com/video-teach- ing-how-to-use-video-in-the-classroom/

Zhang D, Zhou L, Briggs RO, Nunamaker JF Jr. (2006). Instructional video in e-learning: assessing the impact of interactive video on learning effectiveness. Inf Manage 43, pp15–27.

Zhu, C. (2012). Student satisfaction, performance, and knowledge construction in online collaborative learning. Jour- nal of Educational Technology & Society, 15(1), pp127–136.

Downloads

Published

2025-07-01