Impact of Blended Learning Approach on Students’ Metacognition and Academic Achievement in Science: A Meta-analysis During the COVID-19 Pandemic
Keywords:
Blended Learning Approach, Metacognition, Academic Achievement, COVID-19, Pandemic, Science Edu- cation, Meta-analysisAbstract
Blended learning has become the new standard in education that combines both face-to-face and online- based instructions. As this learning approach emerged as a prominent trend in both K to 12 and higher education during the COVID-19 pandemic, its relative usefulness to different learning outcomes must be revisited. The current meta-analysis focuses on studies that answer a gap on the post-test effects of blended learning approach on students’ metacognition and academic achievement in science in comparison to the conventional teaching approach. It includes eligible studies with a total of 25 experiments and 25 effect sizes. The literature is reviewed through different electronic databases to access relevant studies within a ten-year period. The study focused mainly on secondary and tertiary students with 1359 respondents under metacognition and 1082 under academic achievement. The results show that blended learning approach has a small effect size on students’ metacognition (Hedges’ g = 0.25) and a large effect size on academic achievement (Hedges’ g = 0.94). Rosenthal’s fail-safe N also shows large number of unpublished studies with zero mean effect that would be required to make the obtained overall effect statistically nonsignificant. Thus, blended learning approach may help facilitate educational continuity amidst potentially disruptive crises.
Downloads
References
Accra, J. and Chima, N. (2020). Effect of blended learning instructional strategy on senior secondary student’s
achievement and interest in mathematics in Rivers State. International Journal of Applied Research, 6(3),
93-98.
Akgunduz, D. and Akinoglu, O. (2016). The effects of blended learning and social media-supported learning on the
students’ attitude and self-directed learning skills in science education. The Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology, 15(2), 106-115. Retrieved from https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1096457.pdf.
Akgunduz, D. and Akinoglu, O. (2017). The impact of blended learning and social media-supported learning on the
academic success and motivation of the students in science education. Education and Science, 42(191), 69-
90. doi:10.15390/EB.2017.6444.
Aldalalah, O., Shatat, F., and Ababneh, Z. (2019). The impact of blended learning on the development of the cognitive
and metacognitive thinking skills in mathematics of the (ETC) students. Journal of Institutional Research
Southeast Asia, 17(1), 16-42.
Almasaeid, T.F. (2016). The effect of using blended learning strategy on achievement and attitudes in teaching science
among 9th grade students. European Scientific Journal, 10, 133-145.
Alsalhi, N.R., Eltahir, M.E., and Al-Qatawneh, S.S. (2019). The effect of blended learning on the achievement of
ninth grade students in science and their attitudes towards its use. Heliyon, 5, 1-11. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.
heliyon.2019.e02424.
Bolley, S. (2013). Examining the effects of blended learning for ninth grade students who struggle with math. Institute
of Education Sciences.
Bradburn, S. (2020). Forest Plot Interpretation [Video file]. Retrieved April 15, 2024, https://www.youtube.com/
watch?v=Pxs0gl3hRKE.
Camarao, M.K. and Monterola, S.L. (2021). Effects of metacognitive strategy instruction on student conceptual
change in physics: A meta-analysis, Proceedings of the Samahang Pisika ng Pilipinas 39, SPP-2021-3F-01
(2021). URL: https://proceedings.spp-online.org/article/view/SPP-2021-3F-01.
Chandra, V. and Watters, J. (2012). Re-thinking physics teaching with web-based learning. Computers & Education,
58(1), 631-640.
Chen, C. and Jones, O. (2015). Flipped classroom and primary six pupils’ mathematics performance in Abia State,
Nigeria. Journal of Science and Technology. 3(2):23-26.
Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences. (2nd ed.). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Crawford, J., Butler-Henderson, K., Rudolph, J., Malkawi, B., Glowatz, M., Burton, R. et al. (2020). COVID-19: 20
countries’ higher education intra-period digital pedagogy responses. Journal of Applied Learning & Teaching. https://doi.org/10.37074/jalt.2020.3.1.7.
Dagaang, G. (2016). Effects of Technology Based Instruction on Academic Performance and Attitude of Grade VII
Science Students. Unpublished Master’s Thesis Central Mindanao University Graduate School.
Daphine, R., Selvakumar, S., and Sivakumar, P. (2020). Leverage of learning science through blended learning technique. International Journal of Engineering and Advanced Technology, 9(4), 2052-2056. doi:10.35940/ijeat.
D8656.049420.
de Boer, H., Donker, A.S., Kostons, D.D., and van der Werf, G.P. Long-term Effects of Metacognitive Strategy Instruction on Student Academic Performance: A Meta-analysis, Educ Res Rev, 24, 98-115 (2018).
Dziuban, et al. (2018). Blended learning: the new normal and emerging technologies. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 15 (3), 1-16.
Fausett, L., Nierenberg, A., and Pasick, R. (2020). Early childhood distance learning in the U.S. during the COVID
pandemic. Science Direct, 101 (2), 123-126.
Garment, V. (2021). What is blended learning approach? Parallels International GmbH. Retrieved from https://
www.parallels.com/blogs/ras/what-is-a-blended-learning-approach/?fbclid=IwAR1M9Pa4Mx6pyh9Gb3_
X5BqOGhvQSY-Ivz_RtSyqzvtbLZDIxZbbpDPvKjU
Gronlien, H., Christoffersen, T., Ringstad, O., Andreassen, M., and Lugo, R. (2021). A blended learning strategy
strengthens the nursing students’ performance and self-reported learning outcome achievement in an anatomy, physiology and biochemistry course–A quasi-experimental study. Elsevier, 1471-5953. https://doi.
org/10.1016/j.nepr.2021.103046.
Hajeh, H. and Qarareh, A. (2013). The effectiveness of a program on teaching science based on blended learning for
ninth graders achievement and developing the metacognitive thinking skills. Journal of Educational and
Psychological Sciences, 14(2). https://.doi.org/10.12785/JEPS/140217.
Hak, T., van Rhee, H. J., and Suurmond, R. (2016). How to interpret results of meta-analysis. (Version 1.3) Rotterdam, The Netherlands: Erasmus Rotterdam Institute of Management.
Haranap, F., Manuring, B., and Nasuton, N.E.A. (2019). The effect of blended learning on students’ learning achievement and science process skills in plant tissue culture course. International Journal of Instruction, 12(1),
521-538. doi.org/10.29333/iji.2019.12134a.
Hedges, L. V. and Olkin, I. (1985). Statistical methods for meta-analysis. Orlando, FL: Academic Press.
Hidayatulloh, M., Aftoni, and Cobanoglu, O. (2020). The effects of problem-based learning model and blended learning model to metacognitive awareness as a reflection towards a new normal era. Jurnal Pendidikan Teknologi
dan Kejuruan, 26(2), 183-188. https://doi.org/10.21831/jptk.v26i2.32783.
Higgins, J. and Thomas, J. (2003). Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions, Version 6.4. Chichester (UK): John Wiley & Sons, 2019.
Hinkhouse, H. C. (2013). Investigating blended learning in the high school science classroom. Dissertations and
Theses @ UNI.
Husamah, S. (2015). Blended learning-based learning: Metacognitive awareness of biology education new students.
Journal of Education and Learning, 9(4), 274-281. Retrieved from https://eprints.umm.ac.id.
Ignacio, A. (2021). Online classes and learning in the Philippines during the Covid-19 Pandemic. International Journal on Integrated Education. https://doi.org/10.31149/ijie.v4i3.
Kavitha, R. K. and Jaisingh, W. (2018). A study on the student experiences in blended learning environments. International Journal of Recent Technology and Engineering (IJRTE), 7 (4), 183-186. https://doi.org/10.35940/
ijrte.2277-3878.
Kazu, I. and Demirkol, M. (2014). Effect of blended learning environment model on high school students’ academic
achievement. TOJET: The Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology, 13(1), 78-87.
Langdon, et al. (2019). Examining the effects of different teaching strategies on metacognition and academic performance. Adv Physiol Educ 43: 414-422. https://doi.org/10.1152/advan.00013.2018.
Lee, Y.C., Lau, K.C., and Yip, V.W.Y. (2016). Blended learning for building student-teachers’ capacity to learn and
teach science-related interdisciplinary subjects: The case of Hong Kong. Asian Association of Open Universities Journal, 11(2), 166-181. https://doi.org/10.1108/AAOUJ-09-2016-0029.
Lestari, U., Susanti, S., and Suwono, H. (2017). Guided inquiry facilitated blended learning to improve metacognitive and learning outcomes of high school students. Journal of Physics, Ser. 824 012068. doi:10.1088/1742-
6596/824/1/012068.
Lilje, O. and Peat, M. (2007). Use of traditional and e-learning components in a blended learning environment. In
Proceedings of the Symposium Science Teaching and Learning Research (pp. 177-180). UniServe Science,
Sydney.
Lin, Y., Tseng, C., and Chiang, P. (2016). The effect of blended learning in mathematics course. EURASIA Journal of
Mathematics and Technology Education, 13(3), 1305-8223. https://doi.org/10.12973/eurasia.2017.00641a.
Lotfali, S. and Ghanbarpour, Z. (2017). Effectiveness of metacognition training and short-term daily practice of mathematics in academic achievement and attitudes towards mathematics. Journal of Interdisciplinary Research.
Migalang, G. (2018). Blended Learning Strategy: Effects on Students Academic Performance and motivation towards
Science Disaster Readiness Concept. Unpublished Masters Thesis Central Mindanao University Graduate
School.
Musyaddad, A. and Suyanto, S. (2019). Comparison of real object and blended learning towards students’ metacognitive knowledge. Journal of Physics: Conference Series 1397 012048. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-
6596/1397/1/012048.
Nair, T.S. and Bindu, R.L. (2016). Effect of blended learning strategy on achievement in biology and social and environmental attitude of students at secondary level. I-manager’s Journal on School Educational Technology,
11(4), 39-52.
Okwuduba, E. N. and Okigbo, E. C. (2018). Effect of teaching methods on students’ academic performance in chemistry in Nigeria: A meta-analytic review. Bulgarian Journal of Science and Education Policy, 12(2), 418 – 434.
Osguthorpe, R.T. and Graham, C.R. (2003). Blended learning environments definitions and directions. The Quarterly
Review of Distance Education, 4 (3), 227-233.
Rosenthal, R. (1979). The file drawer problem and tolerance for null results. Psychological Bulletin, 86(3), 638-64.
dx.doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.86.3.638
Sanwal, N. (2019). Effect of blended learning approach on achievement in mathematics. Online Journal of Multidisciplinary Subjects, 12(4), 541-547.
Shaneyfelt, T. (2013). How to Interpret a Forest Plot [Video file]. Retrieved April 15, 2024, https://youtu.be/py-L8DvJmDc.
Siahaan, P. et al. (2017). Improving Students’ Science Process Skills through Simple Computer Simulations on Linear
Motion Conceptions. Journal of Physics: Conference Series r. 812 012017
Suurmond, R., van Rhee, H., and Hak, T. (2017). Introduction, comparison, and validation of Meta-Essentials: a
free and simple tool for meta-analysis. Research Synthesis Methods. Vol. 8, Iss. 4, 537-553. doi.org/10.1002/
jrsm.1260.
Susan, P. and Chris, S. (2015). Maximising Competency Education and Blended Learning. IncolCompetency Works,
New York.
Tria, J. (2020). The COVID-19 Pandemic through the Lens of Education in the Philippines: The New Normal. International Journal of Pedagogical Development and Lifelong Learning. https://doi.org/10.30935/ijpdll/8311.
UNICEF (2021). Reopening schools safely in the Philippines. Retrieved from https://www.unicef.org/philippines/
reopening-schools-safely?fbclid=IwAR07wKQq0xooJ5d4L5HFIdCW weHxxRZFE_pOSMnzKOEqvsd_
QlXjNcSN2g#:~:text=On%2020%20September%202021%2C%20the,child%20and%20every%20teacher%20safe
UNESCO (2020). Education: From disruption to recovery. Retrieved April 15, 2024, from https://en.unesco.org/covid19/educationresponse.
U.S. Department of Education. (2010). Transforming American education: Learning powered by technology. National
Education Technology Plan 2010. Washington, DC: Author.
Vallejo, N., Vargas, O., and Rodriguez, L. (2019). Effect of metacognitive scaffolding on self-efficacy, metacognition, and achievement in e-learning environments. Knowledge Management & E-learning: An International
Journal (KM&EL), Vol. 11, No. 1. https://doi.org/10.34105/j.kmel.2019.11.001.
Volchenkova, K. (2016). Blended learning: definition, models, implication for higher education. Educ. Sci., 8(2):24–
30.
Wahyuni, S., Sanjaya, I., Erman, E., and Jatmiko, B. (2019). Edmodo-based blended learning model as an alternative
of science learning to motivate and improve junior high school students’ scientific critical thinking skills. International Journal of Emerging Technologies in Learning (IJET), 14(07), pp. 98-110. doi:http://dx.doi.
org/10.3991/ijet.v14i07.9980.
Werth, E., Werth, L., and Kellerer, E. (2013). Transforming K-12 rural education through blended learning: Barriers
and promising practices. Retrieved April 15, 2024, http://www.inacol.org/resource/transforming-k-12-ruraleducation-through-blendedlearning-barriers-and-promising-practices/.
World Health Organization (2023). COVID 19 Vaccines, Western Pacific. Retrieved from https://www.who.int/westernpacific/emergencies/covid-19/covid-19-vaccines?fbclid=IwAR2IPuiZ2s1cBCH8tk1QqrcsxNHWideY5or
Sh7Wxs0i_IJJ4uEJLG__i5ho
Yapici, I.U. and Akbayin, H. (2012). The effect of blended learning model on high school students’ biology achievement and their attitudes towards the internet. TOJET: The Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology,
11(2), 228-237.
Zhang, D., Zhao, J. L., Zhou, L., and Nunamaker Jr, J. F. (2004). Can e-learning replace classroom learning? Communications of the ACM, 47(5), 75-79.
Zhu Y., Au, W., and Yates, G.C.R. (2013). University students’ attitudes toward online learning in a blended course.
Paper presented at AARE Annual Conference, Adelaide 2013.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 International Journal Of Teacher Education & Teaching

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
-
Copyright Ownership
All content published in this journal, including articles, images, and other materials, is the exclusive property of the journal. Authors transfer the copyright to the journal upon acceptance for publication. -
Usage Rights
The journal holds the rights to publish, reproduce, distribute, and archive all accepted works in any format or medium. Authors may share their published work for non-commercial purposes with proper acknowledgment of the journal as the original publisher. -
Open Access Policy
Articles are made available for reading and downloading for educational and research purposes. Any commercial use or reproduction requires prior written permission from the journal. -
Restrictions
Users may not alter, sell, or republish the content without formal authorization from the journal. -
Third-Party Content
Any material not owned by the journal is clearly identified, and separate permissions may be required for its use. -
Disclaimer
While every effort is made to ensure accuracy, the journal is not liable for any misuse, errors, or omissions in published content. Authors are responsible for the originality and authenticity of their submissions.