Students’ and Teachers’ Understanding of the Concept of Democracy in the State of Jammu & Kashmir, India
Keywords:
Concept of Democracy, Democratic Theory, Democracy EducationAbstract
The purpose of this research study is to comprehend secondary school students’ and teachers’ sentiments
concerning democracy in the state of Jammu & Kashmir (J&K). The key intention was to explore how school
education plays a major role in infusing the ideas and values of democracy among students and teachers of
J&K. To scrutinise the understanding of this concept, an exploratory study has been conducted. A total of 512
students and 84 teachers from 10 schools in 5 different districts of J&K have been selected as samples by using
purposive/ convenience sampling method. The researcher applied a self-developed questionnaire with semistructured interviews, focused group discussions and classroom observation as a part of the required field work.
The findings of the study indicate that conceptualisation of the term ‘democracy’ amongst students is most
commonly associated with some facets of liberal democracy through a general focus on elections and voting,
majority rule and individual civil liberties. An aspect of consciously idealistic conception of democracy has been
also found. Democracy is understood as a utopia that maintains equality, liberty, unity, and the constitutional
rights. Overall, democracy, in reasonable terms, appears more common than what we might have initially
presumed. Moreover, although the evidence is mixed, it appears that interpretations are more prevalent based
on ideas of freedom and liberty. One central implication of the study will be fruitful to present curriculum and
pedagogical practices to develop democratic classroom processes which can help to heal conflict hit society and
instil hope for better future.
Downloads
References
Al-Zubi, M. (2017). The degree of practicing democracy in the EFL classroom according to perceptions of instructors. English Language Teaching, 11(1), 136-140. http://dx.doi.org/10.5539/elt.v11n1p136
Andrabi, S.D.A. (2017). Dogra rule: State of Jammu and Kashmir (1846-1952). International Journal of Trend in Scientific Research and Development, 1(6), 123-127. https://dx.doi.org/10.31142/ijtsrd2489
Arora, P. (2013). A democratic classroom: Need, significance and implications for social science. New Delhi: Nirmal Publication
Batra, P. (2010). Introduction. In P. Batra (Ed.) Social science learning in schools: Perspective and challenges (pp.
3-41). New Delhi: Sage Publication.
Broom, C. (2017). Extending our understanding of lived experiences. Democracy & Education, 25(2), 1-5. Retrieved from https://democracyeducationjournal.org/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1370&context=home
Buyukkaragoz, S. (1995). Programs of higher education and democratic attitudes. Ankara: Turkish Democracy Foundation.
Cambridge English Dictionary. Democracy. Retrieved from https://dictionary.cambridge.org/dictionary/english/ democracy
Ciftci, S. (2013). The relationships between students’ attitudes towards social studies and their perceptions of democracy. Educational Research and Reviews, 8(3), 77-83. http://dx.doi.org/10.5897/ERR11.12.12-1080
Collins English Dictionary. Democracy. Retrieved from https://www.collinsdictionary.com/dictionary/english/democracy Couto, R. (1998). The art of teaching democracy. Change, 30(2), 34-38. Retrieved from www.jstor.org/stable/40165559 Daher, W. (2012). Student teachers’ perceptions of democracy in the mathematics classroom: Freedom, equality and
dialogue. Pythagoras, 33(2), 1-11. http://dxdoi.org/10.4102/pythagoras.v33i2.158
Dalton, R. J, Shin, D. C, & Jou, W. (2007). Popular conceptions of the meaning of democracy: Democratic understanding in unlikely places. UC Irvine: Center for the Study of Democracy. Retrieved from https:// escholarship.org/uc/item/2j74b860
Dewey, J. (1916). Democracy and education. Delhi: Aakor Books.
Dogan, I. (2005). Cultural foundations of democracy, citizenship and human rights in modern society. Ankara: Pegem Akademi Publishing.
Doganay, A. (2008). What does democracy mean to 14-year-old Turkish children? A comparison with results of the 1999 IEA civic education study. Research Papers in Education, 25(1), 51-71. http://dxdoi. org/10.1080/02671520802315060
Dundar, H. (2012). Elementary students’ metaphors for democracy. Educational Research and Reviews, 7(24), 509-
516. http://dx.doi.org/10.5897/err12.080
Dushi, G. (2010). Essay on the Aims of education in democratic India. Retrieved from http://www.preservearticles.
com/2012010920231/essay-on-the-aims-of-education-in-democratic-india.html3
European Foundation for South Asian Studies. (2018). Hartals in Jammu and Kashmir; cause for social, political and
economic instability (pp. 1-8). Amsterdam. Retrieved from https://www.efsas.org/publications/study-papers/
hartals-in-jammu-and-kashmir;-cause-for-social,-political-and-economic-instability/
Feu, J., Serra, C., Canimas, J., Lazaro, L., & Simo-Gil, N. (2017). Democracy and education: A theoretical proposal
for the analysis of democratic practices in schools. Studies in Philosophy and Education, 36(6), 647-661.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11217-017-9570-7
Fuchs, D., & Roller, E. (2018). Conceptualizing and measuring the quality of democracy: The citizens’
perspective. Politics and Governance, 6(1), 22-32. http://dx.doi.org/10.17645/pag.v6i1.1188
Garforth, F. (1980). Educative democracy. New York: Oxford University Press.
Gokce, F. (2009). State and education in change process. Ankara: Pegem Akademi Publishing.
Government of India (1992). National Policy on Education 1986, Programme of Action, Ministry of Human Resource
Development. New Delhi: Department of Education.
Government of India. (1950). University Education Commission, 1949 (Radhakrishnan Commission Report). New
Delhi: Ministry of Education.
Government of India. (1968). National Policy on Education, 1968. New Delhi: Ministry of Education.
Grossman, D. (2008). Democracy, citizenship education and inclusion: A multi-dimensional
approach. PROSPECTS, 38(1), 35-46. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11125-008-9054-1
Habermas, J. (1995). Three normative models of democracy. In E.O. Eriksen (Ed.), Deliberative politics: Democracy
in theory and practice (pp. 30-45). Oslo: TANO.
Jacobs, G., & Power, M.A. (2016). Student centered learning: An approach to fostering democracy in schools.
Student Centered Learning and Democracy, 4(2), 79-87. Retrieved from https://media.neliti.com/media/
publications/231673-student-centered-learning-an-approach-to-3014e1d6.pdf
Jain, M. (2004). Civics, citizens and human rights: Civics discourse in India. Contemporary Education Dialogue, 1(2),
165-198.
Kıncal, R.Y. (2004). Citizenship. Ankara: Nobel Publishing.
Kubow, P. (2007). Teachers’ constructions of democracy: Intersections of western and indigenous knowledge
in South Africa and Kenya. Comparative Education Review, 51(3), 307-328. http://dx.doi.
org/10.1086/518479
Kumar, K. (1993). Democracy and education in India. Delhi: Radiant Publisher.
Kus, Z., & Cetin, T. (2014). Perceptions of democracy of primary school students. Educational Sciences: Theory &
Practice, 14(2), 786-790. http://dx.doi.org/10.12738/estp.2014.2.1493
Malik, N.A. & Majid, A. (2016). Kashmir: In historical perspective. JPUHS, 29(2), 1-10. Retrieved from http://
pu.edu.pk/images/journal/HistoryPStudies/PDF-FILES/1-v29_2_16.pdf
Mathe, N. (2016). Students’ understanding of the concept of democracy and implications for teacher education in
social studies. Acta Didactica Norge, 10(2), 271-289. http://dx.doi.org/10.5617/adno.2437
Ministry of Education (1966). Report of the Education Commission 1964-66: Education and National Development
(Kothari Commission). NCERT Reprint Edition 1971
Munck, G.L. (2016). What is democracy? A reconceptualization of the quality of democracy. Democratization, 23(1),
1-26. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1080/13510347.2014.918104
NCERT. (2005). National Curriculum Framework. New Delhi. Retrieved from http://www.ncert.nic.in/rightside/links/
pdf/framework/english/nf2005.pdf
Pateman, C. (1970). Participation and democratic theory. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Rasch, B.E. (2004). Introduction. In B.E. Rasch (Ed.), Democracy: Conditions and consequences (11-22). Bergen
Sarwar, M., Yousuf, M., & Hussain, S. (2010). Attitude toward democracy in Pakistan: Secondary school teachers’
perceptions. Journal of College Teaching & Learning, 7(3), 33-38. http://dx.doi.org/10.19030/tlc.v7i3.100
Schumpeter, J. (1994). Capitalism, socialism and democracy. London: Routledge.
Tonga, D. (2014). How can we get the information about democracy? The example of social studies prospective
teachers. Journal of World of Turks, 6(2), 265-277. Retrieved from https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/
ED548042.pdf
Vinovsky, E., & Zolcer, S. (2016). Dewey’s participatory educational democracy. Educational Theory, 66(1-2), 55-71.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/edth.12152
Vinterek, M. (2010). How to live democracy in the classroom. Education Inquiry, 1(4), 367-380. http://dx.doi.
org/10.3402/edui.v1i4.21951
Weasel, L. (2017). From deliberative democracy to communicative democracy in the classroom. Democracy &
Education, 25(1), 1-6. Retrieved from https://democracyeducationjournal.org/home/vol25/iss1/8/
Wojcik, M. (2009). Political Education. Retrieved from http://rcie.home.pl/y4m/wp/?page_id=57
Yesil, R. (2002). Human rights and democracy education in schools and families. Ankara: Nobel Press.
Zyngier, D. (2011). Rethinking the thinking on democracy in education: What are educators thinking (and doing)
about democracy? Education Sciences, 2(1), 1-21. http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/educ2010001
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2020 International Journal Of Teacher Education & Teaching

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
-
Copyright Ownership
All content published in this journal, including articles, images, and other materials, is the exclusive property of the journal. Authors transfer the copyright to the journal upon acceptance for publication. -
Usage Rights
The journal holds the rights to publish, reproduce, distribute, and archive all accepted works in any format or medium. Authors may share their published work for non-commercial purposes with proper acknowledgment of the journal as the original publisher. -
Open Access Policy
Articles are made available for reading and downloading for educational and research purposes. Any commercial use or reproduction requires prior written permission from the journal. -
Restrictions
Users may not alter, sell, or republish the content without formal authorization from the journal. -
Third-Party Content
Any material not owned by the journal is clearly identified, and separate permissions may be required for its use. -
Disclaimer
While every effort is made to ensure accuracy, the journal is not liable for any misuse, errors, or omissions in published content. Authors are responsible for the originality and authenticity of their submissions.