Brown v. Unnikrishnan: A Tale of Two Landmarks

Authors

  • Dr. Suman Lata Author

Keywords:

Brown, Judicial Activism, RTE, Segregation, Unnikrishnan

Abstract

Rise in the powers of Judiciary and increasing dependence on courts for the declaration and promotion of socio­ economic rights in democracies is a global phenomenon. Proactive role played by Judiciary in safeguarding rights of citizens through creative interpretation of the Constitutional tenets and adapting to the changing structures of society and rights discourse, has generated a debate about the role of Judiciary. It has earned all types of positive and negative titles ranging from saviour, pioneer, activist, over enthusiastic, usurper etc. Efficacy of judicial pronouncements, in the area of socio­economic rights, is a moot point getting mixed responses from scholars. This paper discusses the role of Judiciary, in the area of school education with specific reference to two landmark judgments by the Supreme Courts of the United States of America and India. It is an attempt to understand the significance of these two judgments in terms of their implementation and impact.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Baxi, Upendra (1982). Who Bothers about the Supreme Court? The Problem of Impact of Judicial Decisions, Journal

of the Indian Law Institute, Vol. 24:4 pp.848-862

Dam, Shubhankar & Vivek, Tiwary (2005). Polluting Environment, Polluting Constitution: Is a polluted Constitution

worse than a polluted environment? Journal of International Law, Vol. 17, No. 3 pp. 383-393. Doi:10.1093/

jel/eqio29.

Garrow, David J. (2004). “Happy” Birthday, Brown v. Board of Education? Brown’s Fiftieth Anniversary and the

New Critics of Supreme Court Muscularity. Virginia Law Review, Vol. 90, Issue 2 pp.693-729 Available at

www.virginialawreview.org/...happy-birthday-brown-board-education-browns-fiftieth-anniversary-and-newcritics JUSTIA US Supreme Court https://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/163/537/case.html

Harvey, William B, Harvey, Adia M. & King, Mark. (2004). The Impact of Brown v. Board of Education Decision

on Post Secondary Participation of African Americans. The Journal of Negro Education. Vol. 73, No. 3,

Special Issue: Brown v. Board of Education at 50. Pp. 328-340

James, Letitia. (2014). The Legacy of Brown v. Board of Education Available at https://huffingtonpost.com/letitiajames/the-legacy-of-brown-vs-bo_b_5339933.html

Khosla, Madhav. (2009). Addressing Judicial Activism in the Indian Supreme Court: Towards an Evolved Debate.

Hastings International Law & Comparative Law Review, Vol. 32, Issue 1. Pp. 55-99 Available at

SSRN:https://ssrn.com/abstract=1394230

Klarman, Michael J. (1994). Brown, Racial Change, and the Civil Rights Movement. Virginia Law Review, Vol. 80,

Issue7 PP. 1-94 Available at https://wiki.duke.edu/...BROWN%20RACIAL%20CHANGE%20THE%20

CIVIL%20RIGHTS%20MOVEMENT%20pdf.

Kmiec, Keenan D. (2004). The Origin and Current Meanings of Judicial Activism. California Law Review, Vol, 92,

Issue5 Article 4. Pp. 14442-14477Available at: http://scholarship.law.berekeley.edu/californialawreview/vol.

92/iss5/4 Legal Dictionary at https://legaldictionary.net/judicial-activism/

Minow, Martha. (2014). Surprising Legacies of Brown v. Board. Washington University of Law & Policy, Vol. 16, pp.

11-42 Available at http://openscholarship.wustl.edu/law_journal_law_policy/vol16/iss1/3

Nagasalia, D.& Suresh, V. (1992). Can Right to Education be a Fundamental Right? ,Economic and Political Weekly,

Vol. 27, Issue No. 45, pp.2442-2443

Patterson, James T. (2001). The Troubled Legacy of Brown v. Board. African-American Studies at the Woodrow

Wilson Center. Pp. 1-13 Available at https://www.wilsoncenter.org/sites/default/files/ACF236.pdfPlessy v.

Ferguson 163 U.S. 537(1896) https://www.history.com/black-history/plessy-v-ferguson

Rosenberg, G. (2005). Courting Disaster: Looking for Change in All the Wrong Places, Drake Law Review, Vol. 54,

pp. 795-829. Available at http://chicagounbound.uchicago.edu/journal_articles.

Ruparelia, Sanjay. (2013). A Progressive Juristocracy?: The Unexpected Social Activism of India’s Supreme Court.

Working Paper 391. The Hellen Kellog Institute for International Studies. Pp.1-55 Available at http://dx.doi.

org/10.2139/ssrn.2807217

Sadgopal, Anil. (2001). Political Economy of the Ninety-Third Amendment Bill. Mainstream. December 22, 2001

Sadgopal, Anil. (2008). Misconceiving Fundamentals, Dismantling Rights: Deciphering the neo-liberal assault on

Right to Education. Available at www.educationforallinindia.com/CSS2.pdf

Sathe, S.P. (1992). Supreme Court on Right to Education, Economic and Political Weekly, Vol. 27, Issue No. 35, Aug.

1992, pp.1847-1848.

Tushnet, Mark (2004). Some Legacies of Brown v. Board of Education. Virginia Law Review. Vol. 90 pp. 1693-1720

Available at http://scholarship.law.georgetown.edu/facpub/253 William, Neil G. (2004). Brown v. Board of Education

Fifty Years Later: What Makes for Greatness in a Legal Opinion? Loyola University Chicago, School of

Law, LAW e Commons. Pp. 177-199 Available at https://lawecommons.luc.edu

Downloads

Published

2026-01-27

Issue

Vol. 1 No. 1 (2021): International Journal Of Teacher Education & Teaching January 2021

Section

Research Articles

License

Copyright (c) 2021 International Journal Of Teacher Education & Teaching

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

  • Copyright Ownership
    All content published in this journal, including articles, images, and other materials, is the exclusive property of the journal. Authors transfer the copyright to the journal upon acceptance for publication.

  • Usage Rights
    The journal holds the rights to publish, reproduce, distribute, and archive all accepted works in any format or medium. Authors may share their published work for non-commercial purposes with proper acknowledgment of the journal as the original publisher.

  • Open Access Policy
    Articles are made available for reading and downloading for educational and research purposes. Any commercial use or reproduction requires prior written permission from the journal.

  • Restrictions
    Users may not alter, sell, or republish the content without formal authorization from the journal.

  • Third-Party Content
    Any material not owned by the journal is clearly identified, and separate permissions may be required for its use.

  • Disclaimer
    While every effort is made to ensure accuracy, the journal is not liable for any misuse, errors, or omissions in published content. Authors are responsible for the originality and authenticity of their submissions.