Left Out for I am Slow: A Phenomenological Study on Lived Experiences of College Students
Keywords:
Slow Learner, Academic Circle, Turning Point, Out of Place, college lifeAbstract
Academic performance in the form of grades has been the defining factor for students to be classified into groups. With the questions on the quality of teaching and learning, it is best to focus on students who felt left out of the academic circle. Thus, Phenomenological Research, with the help of a semi-structured interview, identified and explored the lived experiences of college students who felt being left out because of their deviation from typical high achievers. This study was anchored on Sternberg’s Theory of Thinking Styles and Perry’s Theory of Cognitive Development. From the data analysis with implementation of the Colaizzi Process, Three Major Themes emerged: (1) Admitting Limitation; (2) Understanding Exclusion; and (3) Self-Worth Valuation. The result showed that these students shared an experience of being excluded due to their academic ability. They mostly end up leaving the academic circle as a major resort in escaping the feeling of being left out. Despite such unfortunate predicament, they aspire to do good in areas where they excel and slowly gain the confidence in believing in oneself. It is recommended that the schools place equal value and attention to all types of students. Further and in-depth studies are also recommended.
Downloads
References
Abedi, J. (2004). The No Child Left Behind Act and English Language Learners: Assessment and Accountability Issues. Educational Researcher. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X033001004
Adams, W. C. (2015). Conducting Semi-Structured Interviews. In Handbook of Practical Program Evaluation: Fourth Edition. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781119171386.ch19
Ainin, S., Naqshbandi, M. M., Moghavvemi, S., & Jaafar, N. I. (2015). Facebook usage, socialization and academic performance. Computers and Education. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2014.12.018
Al-Dubai, S. A. R., Al-Naggar, R. A., Alshagga, M. A., & Rampal, K. G. (2011). Stress and coping strategies of students in a medical faculty in Malaysia. Malaysian Journal of Medical Sciences.
Arifin, S. R. M. (2018). Ethical considerations in qualitative study. International Journal of Care Scholars. Cabanac, A., Perlovsky, L., Bonniot-Cabanac, M. C., & Cabanac, M. (2013). Music and academic performance.
Behavioural Brain Research. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bbr.2013.08.023
Cassady, J. C., & Johnson, R. E. (2002). Cognitive test anxiety and academic performance. Contemporary Educational Psychology. https://doi.org/10.1006/ceps.2001.1094
Cerbone, D. R. (2010). Understanding phenomenology. In Understanding Phenomenology. https://doi.org/10.5840/ teachphil199316222
Connelly, L. M. (2010). What is phenomenology? In Medsurg nursing : official journal of the Academy of Medical- Surgical Nurses. https://doi.org/10.1017/s1477175600000798
Corbin, J., & Strauss, A. (2012). Basics of Qualitative Research (3rd ed.): Techniques and Procedures for Developing Grounded Theory. In Basics of Qualitative Research (3rd ed.): Techniques and Procedures for Developing Grounded Theory. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781452230153
Creswell, J. W. (2003). Research design Qualitative quantitative and mixed methods approaches. Research Design Qualitative Quantitative and Mixed Methods Approaches. https://doi.org/10.3109/08941939.2012.723954
Curcio, G., Ferrara, M., & De Gennaro, L. (2006). Sleep loss, learning capacity and academic performance. In Sleep Medicine Reviews. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.smrv.2005.11.001
Dalal, A. K., & Priya, K. R. (2016). Introduction to qualitative research. In Qualitative Research on Illness, Wellbeing and Self-Growth: Contemporary Indian Perspectives. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315539829-7
Daley, D., & Birchwood, J. (2010). ADHD and academic performance: Why does ADHD impact on academic performance and what can be done to support ADHD children in the classroom? In Child: Care, Health and Development. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2214.2009.01046.x
Deasy, C., Coughlan, B., Pironom, J., Jourdan, D., & Mannix-McNamara, P. (2014). Psychological distress and coping amongst higher education students: A Mixed method enquiry. PLoS ONE. https://doi.org/10.1371/ journal.pone.0115193
Dolores, M., & Tongco, C. (2016). Purposive Sampling as a Tool for Informant Selection. Ethnobotany Research & Applications.
Duckworth, A. L., & Seligman, M. E. P. (2005). Self-discipline outdoes IQ in predicting academic performance of adolescents. Psychological Science. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9280.2005.01641.x
El-Ghoroury, N. H., Galper, D. I., Sawaqdeh, A., & Bufka, L. F. (2012). Stress, coping, and barriers to wellness among psychology graduate students. Training and Education in Professional Psychology. https://doi.
org/10.1037/a0028768
Fares, J., Al Tabosh, H., Saadeddin, Z., El Mouhayyar, C., & Aridi, H. (2016). Stress, burnout and coping strategies in preclinical medical students. In North American Journal of Medical Sciences. https://doi.org/10.4103/1947- 2714.177299
Florence, M. D., Asbridge, M., & Veugelers, P. J. (2008). Diet Quality and Academic Performance. Journal of School Health. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1746-1561.2008.00288.x
Foureaux Koppensteiner, M. (2014). Automatic grade promotion and student performance: Evidence from Brazil.
Journal of Development Economics. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdeveco.2013.12.007
Fraenkel, J. R., & Wallen, N. E. (2006). The Basic of Educational Research. In How to design and evaluate resaerch in education with PowerWeb.
Ganyaupfu, E. M. (2013). Teaching Methods and Students’ Academic Performance. International Journal of Humanities and Social Science Invention ISSN (Online.
Gibbons, C., Dempster, M., & Moutray, M. (2011). Stress, coping and satisfaction in nursing students. Journal of Advanced Nursing. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2648.2010.05495.x
Honicke, T., & Broadbent, J. (2016). The influence of academic self-efficacy on academic performance: A systematic review. In Educational Research Review. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2015.11.002
Junco, R. (2012). In-class multitasking and academic performance. Computers in Human Behavior. https://doi.
org/10.1016/j.chb.2012.06.031
Junco, R., & Cotten, S. R. (2012). No A 4 U: The relationship between multitasking and academic performance.
Computers and Education. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2011.12.023
Kallio, H., Pietilä, A. M., Johnson, M., & Kangasniemi, M. (2016). Systematic methodological review: developing a framework for a qualitative semi-structured interview guide. In Journal of Advanced Nursing. https://doi. org/10.1111/jan.13031
Kirschner, P. A., & Karpinski, A. C. (2010). Facebook® and academic performance. Computers in Human Behavior.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2010.03.024
Klein, A. (2015). No Child Left Behind: An Overview. Education Week.
Layous, K., Davis, E. M., Garcia, J., Purdie-Vaughns, V., Cook, J. E., & Cohen, G. L. (2017). Feeling left out, but affirmed: Protecting against the negative effects of low belonging in college. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2016.09.008
Malterud, K. (2012). Systematic text condensation: A strategy for qualitative analysis. Scandinavian Journal of Public Health. https://doi.org/10.1177/1403494812465030
Menken, K. (2009). No child left behind and its effects on language policy. In Annual Review of Applied Linguistics.
https://doi.org/10.1017/S0267190509090096
Mills, J., & Birks, M. (2017). Qualitative Methodology: A Practical Guide. In Qualitative Methodology: A Practical Guide. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781473920163
Mills, J., Birks, M., Mills, J., & Birks, M. (2017). Introducing Qualitative Research. In Qualitative Methodology: A Practical Guide. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781473920163.n1
Morrow, R., Rodriguez, A., & King, N. (2015). Colaizzi’s descriptive phenomenological method. The Psychologist. Neubauer, B. E., Witkop, C. T., & Varpio, L. (2019). How phenomenology can help us learn from the experiences of
others. Perspectives on Medical Education. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40037-019-0509-2
Paul, J. A., Baker, H. M., & Cochran, J. D. (2012). Effect of online social networking on student academic performance. Computers in Human Behavior. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2012.06.016
Poropat, A. E. (2009). A Meta-Analysis of the Five-Factor Model of Personality and Academic Performance.
Psychological Bulletin. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0014996
Reay, D., Crozier, G., & Clayton, J. (2010). “Fitting in” or “standing out”: Workingclass students in UK higher education. British Educational Research Journal. https://doi.org/10.1080/01411920902878925
Richardson, M., Abraham, C., & Bond, R. (2012). Psychological correlates of university students’ academic performance: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin. https://doi.org/10.1037/ a0026838
Ritchie, J., & Ormston, R. (2014). The applications of qualitative methods to social research. In Qualitative Reasearch Practice: a Guide for Social Science Students and Researchers.
Roberts, L. D. (2015). Ethical Issues in Conducting Qualitative Research in Online Communities. Qualitative Research in Psychology. https://doi.org/10.1080/14780887.2015.1008909
Robinson, O. C. (2014). Sampling in Interview-Based Qualitative Research: A Theoretical and Practical Guide.
Qualitative Research in Psychology. https://doi.org/10.1080/14780887.2013.801543
Symeonides, R., & Childs, C. (2015). The personal experience of online learning: An interpretative phenomenological analysis. Computers in Human Behavior. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2015.05.015
Wilson, C. (2014). Semi-Structured Interviews. In Interview Techniques for UX Practitioners. https://doi.org/10.1016/ b978-0-12-410393-1.00002-8
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2021 International Journal Of Teacher Education & Teaching

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
-
Copyright Ownership
All content published in this journal, including articles, images, and other materials, is the exclusive property of the journal. Authors transfer the copyright to the journal upon acceptance for publication. -
Usage Rights
The journal holds the rights to publish, reproduce, distribute, and archive all accepted works in any format or medium. Authors may share their published work for non-commercial purposes with proper acknowledgment of the journal as the original publisher. -
Open Access Policy
Articles are made available for reading and downloading for educational and research purposes. Any commercial use or reproduction requires prior written permission from the journal. -
Restrictions
Users may not alter, sell, or republish the content without formal authorization from the journal. -
Third-Party Content
Any material not owned by the journal is clearly identified, and separate permissions may be required for its use. -
Disclaimer
While every effort is made to ensure accuracy, the journal is not liable for any misuse, errors, or omissions in published content. Authors are responsible for the originality and authenticity of their submissions.