Broken But Not Shattered: A Case Study on the Experiences of Single Student-Fathers
Keywords:
Single Student-Fathers, Teenage Fathers, Qualitative Research, Case Study, Thematic Analysis, Tagum CityAbstract
The case study aimed to discover the unique characteristics, common and distinct practices, and elemental considerations of the single student-fathers in Tagum City. In this study, three (3) participants aged 12-19 were chosen to participate in in-depth interviews, who were the single student-fathers who became father while in school, who were able to experience the central phenomenon of the study. Thematic analysis was used in analyzing the data. From the unique characteristics of each case, the result revealed three major themes such as overwhelming responsibilities, losing freedom, and poor academic performance. On the common and distinct practices, three major themes were extracted such as support system, following parent’s advice, and being focused. Three themes were extracted from the elemental considerations in single student-fathers such as learning from experience, facing responsibilities, and facing problem squarely. With the result of this study, it implies that single student-fathers could discover and put into considerations the attributes and behaviour of a father which will enable them to produce quality fatherhood. Moreover, this study is deemed significant to single student-fathers and other single student-fathers in a certain locality.
Downloads
References
Creswell, J. W. (2013). Qualitative Inquiry & Research Design: Choosing Among the Five Approcahes, Thousand
Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications, In
Creswell, J. W. & Willis, (2007). Retrieved November 20, 2019. https:/repository.nwu.ac.za/bitstream/handle/10394/14230/Davel _DH.
Domina, T. (2015) Levelling the home advantages: assessing the effectiveness of parental involvement in elementary school. Sociology of Education.78, 233 - 249.
Everett, C.A. (2016). Children of divorce: Developmental and clinical issues. New York.The Haworth Press.
Eamon, M . (2015) social-demographic, school, neighbourhood, and parenting influences on academic achievement of Latino young adolescents. Journal of Youth and Adolescents, 34(2),163-175.
Ferrell, R.T. (2017). The effects of single-parent households on student academic success, attendance and suspensions. USA: UMI Microform 3354734.
Flanagan A.E. and Murray, S.E. (2016). A decade of reform: The impact of school.Reform in Kentucky. Paper
presented at the Center for Education Research Education Conference.
Fraser, M.W (2014). The ecology of childhood: A multisystem perspective. M. W. Fraser (Ed.), Risk and resilience
in childhood: An ecological perspective (2nd ed., pp. 1-12). Washington, DC: NASW Press.
Garasky, S. (2016). The effects of family structure on educational attainment: Do the effects vary by the age
of the child? American Journal of Economics and Sociology, Inc.54 (1)89-105.
Golafshani, N. (2016). Understanding reliability and validity in qualitative research. The qualitative Report Vol 8(4)
597-607.
Guba, E.G (1999). Paradigmatic controversies, contradictions and emerging confluences. Beverly Hills CA:
Sage Publications.
Henderson, A.T., and Berla, N.(2015).A new generation of evidence: The family is critical to student achievement. Washington DC:Center for Law and Education.
Henslin, J.M. (2016). Sociology. Singapore: Allyn & Bacon.
Hetcher, M. (2018). Principals of group solidarity. Berkeley: University of CA.P.
Hochschild, J. (2016).Social Class in Public Schools. Journal of SocialIssues,59(4),821-840.
Hughes, D.L. (2017). The Effects of divorce on children: U.S.A, University of Illinois. Board of Trustees.
Jeynes,W.H.(2018). Examining the effects of parental absence on the academic achievement of adolescents:
the challenges of controlling family income. Journal of Family and Economic Issues 23(2).
Kegan.L. and Lehey (2015). The Effects of divorce on children: U.S.A, University of Illinois. Board of Trustees.
Levey, M . (2017)social- demographic, school, neighbourhood, and parenting influences on academic achievement of Latino young adolescents. Journal of Youth and Adolescents, 34(2),163-175.
Lincoln, Y.S., & Guba, E.G (1985). Paradigmatic controversies, contradictions and emerging confluences. Beverly
Hills CA: Sage Publications.
Litchman, M. (2006). Qualitative research in education. A users guide, London, SAGE Publications.
Patton, M.Q. (2015). Qualitative research and evaluation methods. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications.
Polkinghorn, D.E. (2005). Narrative configuration in qualitative analysis, conducting, and evaluating qualitative research. Upper Saddler River, New Jersey. Pearson Education. Inc.
Smith, N. (2017). Understanding reliability and validity in qualitative research. The qualitative Report Vol
8(4) 597-607.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2023 International Journal Of Teacher Education & Teaching

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
-
Copyright Ownership
All content published in this journal, including articles, images, and other materials, is the exclusive property of the journal. Authors transfer the copyright to the journal upon acceptance for publication. -
Usage Rights
The journal holds the rights to publish, reproduce, distribute, and archive all accepted works in any format or medium. Authors may share their published work for non-commercial purposes with proper acknowledgment of the journal as the original publisher. -
Open Access Policy
Articles are made available for reading and downloading for educational and research purposes. Any commercial use or reproduction requires prior written permission from the journal. -
Restrictions
Users may not alter, sell, or republish the content without formal authorization from the journal. -
Third-Party Content
Any material not owned by the journal is clearly identified, and separate permissions may be required for its use. -
Disclaimer
While every effort is made to ensure accuracy, the journal is not liable for any misuse, errors, or omissions in published content. Authors are responsible for the originality and authenticity of their submissions.