Active Learning & Student Engagement Strategies in ELT

Authors

  • Shivani Gupta Author

Keywords:

English Language Teaching (ELT), Student Engagement, English as Foreign Language (EFL), Facilitation, Bloom’s Cognitive Levels, Freytag’s Pyramid, Socratic Method

Abstract

Student disengagement is a challenge many educators struggle with across the classrooms. Most English Language 
Teachers (ELT) are wary of lack of student attention, as well as poor reading comprehension skills. Students more 
often than not remain distracted when prose is handled in the class through conventional pedagogical methods.
My article is on Student Engagement strategies in teaching English prose. Through my article, I aspire to bring 
some strategies to EL Teachers that can enhance comprehension skills among students. I have discussed five strategies that can be employed in classrooms in the article. These strategies are most appropriate for the students of 
grades 6-12 with English as Foreign Language (EFL).
The article explains how to use each of the strategies as well as outlines the thinking skills involved in solving 
each of the engagement sheets.
I have also enclosed a sample sheet for each of the five strategies that I have suggested.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Anderson, L. W., & Krathwohl, D. R. (Eds.). (2001). A taxonomy for learning, teaching, and assessing: A revision of

Bloom’s taxonomy of educational objectives. Longman.

Bloom, B. S., Engelhart, M. D., Furst, E. J., Hill, W. H., & Krathwohl, D. R. (1956). Taxonomy of educational objectives: The classification of educational goals. Handbook I: Cognitive domain. Longmans, Green.

Burrows, D. E. (1997). Facilitation: A concept analysis. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 25(2), 396–404. https://doi.

org/10.1046/j.1365-2648.1997.1997025396.x

Ciğerci, F. M., & Yıldırım, M. (2024). From Freytag’s pyramid story structure to digital storytelling: Adventures of

pre-service teachers as story writers and digital storytellers. Education and Information Technologies, 29,

5697–5720. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-023-12042-7

Delić, H., & Bećirović, S. (2016). Socratic method as an approach to teaching. European Researcher. Series A,

111(10), 511–517. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/309634848

Freeman, S., Eddy, S. L., McDonough, M., Smith, M. K., Okoroafor, N., Jordt, H., & Wenderoth, M. P. (2014).

Active learning increases student performance in science, engineering, and mathematics. Proceedings of the

National Academy of Sciences, 111(23), 8410–8415. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1319030111

Freytag, G. (1894). Technique of the drama (E. J. MacEwan, Trans.). Scott, Foresman and Company.

Hunt, A., & Beglar, D. (2005). A framework for developing EFL reading vocabulary. Reading in a Foreign Language,

17(1), 23–59. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ689121

Irfan, S. (n.d.). Difference between ESL and EFL: A comparative guide. OI Digital Institute. https://oidigitalinstitute.

com/news/difference-between-esl-and-efl/

Jagtap, P. (2016). Teacher’s role as facilitator in learning. Tilak College of Education. https://d1wqtxts1xzle7.cloudfront.net/49615969

Kindlepreneur. (2025). What are the seven elements of Freytag’s pyramid? https://kindlepreneur.com/freytags-pyramid/

Krathwohl, D. R. (2002). A revision of Bloom’s taxonomy: An overview. Theory into Practice, 41(4), 212–218.

https://doi.org/10.1207/s15430421tip4104_2

Downloads

Published

2026-01-01