Teachers’ Metacognition and Higher Order Thinking Skills of Elementary School Learners in Eastern Samar, Philippines
Keywords:
Creating, Higher Order Thinking Skills, MetacognitionAbstract
This investigation primarily aims at identifying if significant relationship exists between teachers’ metacognition and learners’ Higher Order Thinking Skills (HOTS). The correlational method of research was employed to satisfy the primary objective of the investigation. Two groups of respondents were involved which included total enumeration of Grade VI teachers and randomly selected Grade VI learners in Can-avid District. Through the administration of adapted sets of questionnaire and analysis of data, using appropriate descriptive and inferential statistical tools, the study revealed the following salient findings: (1) Majority of the teacher-respondents indicated a very high level of conceptual knowledge of cognition and planning skills of cognition regulation rather than procedural knowledge and evaluating and monitoring skills; (2) Learners have exhibited very poor Higher Order Thinking Skills in terms of scientific inquiry skills of analyzing, evaluating, and creating; and that (3)Teachers’ metacognition only manifested a negative weak correlation with learners’ creating skills. The study recommends for advancement of teachers’ metacognition and learners’ HOTS through active integration of said skills in the curriculum and providing opportunities for teachers’ professional advancement.
Downloads
References
Bhandari, P. (2021). An introduction to correlational research. Scribbr. https://www.scribbr.com/methodology/
correlational-research/
Bloom, B. S. (Ed). (1956). Taxonomy of educational objectives. Handbook I: Cognitive domain. New York: McKay.
Dewey, J. (1933). How we think: A restatement of the relation of reflective thinking to the educative process. Boston:
D. C. Heath and Company.
Gama, C. (2004). Metacognition in interactive learning environments: The reflection assistant model. In F. Paraguu, J.
Lester, & R. Vicari (Eds.), Intelligent tutoring systems: Proceedings of the 6th international conference (pp.
668-677). New York: Intelligent Tutoring Systems.
Imel, S. (2002). Metacognitive skills for adult learning. Clearinghouse on Adult, Career, and Vocational Education,
39.
King, F. J., Goodson, L., & Rohani, F. (2013). Higher Order Thinking Skills. Retrieved from http://www.cala.fsu.edu
Leutwyler, B. (2009). Metacognitive learning strategies: Differential development patterns in high school.
Metacognition and Learning, 4(2), 111-123.
Lories, V. Y., Dardenne, G. & Yzerbyt, B. (1998). Metacognition: Cognitive and Social Dimensions. London: Sage
Publications Ltd.
Marzano, R. J., Brandt, R. S., Hughes, C. S., Jones, B. F., Presseisen, C. S., Rankin, S. C., & Suhor, C. (1988).
Dimensions of thinking: A framework for curriculum and instruction. Alexandria, VA: Association for
Supervision and Curriculum Development.
Moore, B., & Stanly, T. (2010). Critical thinking and formative assessments. Larchmount, New York: Eye
onEducation, Inc.
Ormrod, J. E. (2006). Educational psychology: Developing learners. Upper Saddle River, N.J: Pearson/Merrill
Prentice Hall.
Pressley, M. (2002). Comprehension strategies instruction: A turn-of-the-century status report. In C. C. Block & M.
Pressley (Eds.), Comprehension instruction: research-based best practices (pp. 11–27). New York: Guilford.
Schraw, Gregory, Robinson, DH. 2011. Assessment of Higer Order Thinking Skills. America: Information Age
Publishing.
Stewart, J., & Landine, J. (1995). Study skills from a metacognitive perspective. Guidance & Counseling, 11(1), 16-
20. Teacher Performance Assessment (2012). About the TPA. Retrieved fromhttp://tpafieldtest.nesinc.com/
PageView.aspx?f=GEN_AbouttheTests.html
Wilson, N. S., & Bai, H. (2010). The relationships and impact of teachers’ metacognitive knowledge and pedagogical
understandings of metacognition. Metacognition and learning, 5(3), 269-288. https://link.springer.com/
content/pdf/10.1007/s11409-010-9062-4.pdf
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2022 International Journal Of Teacher Education & Teaching

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
-
Copyright Ownership
All content published in this journal, including articles, images, and other materials, is the exclusive property of the journal. Authors transfer the copyright to the journal upon acceptance for publication. -
Usage Rights
The journal holds the rights to publish, reproduce, distribute, and archive all accepted works in any format or medium. Authors may share their published work for non-commercial purposes with proper acknowledgment of the journal as the original publisher. -
Open Access Policy
Articles are made available for reading and downloading for educational and research purposes. Any commercial use or reproduction requires prior written permission from the journal. -
Restrictions
Users may not alter, sell, or republish the content without formal authorization from the journal. -
Third-Party Content
Any material not owned by the journal is clearly identified, and separate permissions may be required for its use. -
Disclaimer
While every effort is made to ensure accuracy, the journal is not liable for any misuse, errors, or omissions in published content. Authors are responsible for the originality and authenticity of their submissions.